![]() This is the *learning edition* – you’re permitted to distribute apps you write with it, but you can’t use the /Ox compiler switches to generate optimised code. VC++.NET Standard does NOT come with an optimising compiler. If you’re considering buying this ‘Standard version’, take note of the difference between it and the version that comes with ‘Professional’ Visual Studio package: The debugger is great, the IDE is much nicer than any other I’ve used, and IntelliSense is very handy to have. NET (the full package) for a while at work, and it’s been working very well. Reviewer: myelin from Christchurch, New Zealand NET, your SKU is ?Microsoft Visual Studio. NET Standard 2002.? Or if you buy the optimizing compiler as part of the cheapest Visual Studio. NET, the SKU you purchase is ?Microsoft Visual C++. For example, if you buy the non-optimizing or academic version of Visual C++. ![]() NET 2002 is just the general product name the SKU (or ?shelf-keeping unit?) name is more elaborate. Anyone interested should check that before and make sure they can return it if it is not the case. But basically it looks as if they now ship the optimizing compiler with the standard version as well. I can´t find the feature overview for 2002 anymore, only the one for 2003, but to give juraj at least a chance to believe me i dug the following links out. I was referring to the 2002 Version which i bought and there it was definitely the case. I just checked the website, it looks indeed as if they changed that for the 2003 Version. Unfortunately the compiler in the Standard Edition is not the fully optimizing oneĪnonymouscoder, do you have proof for it? Because I think this is the worst bullshit I read in a week. When i decide to turn everything over to another reference-compiler ( most likely gcc ) i already know that everything works without warning and hazzle. The different warnings i got from the compilers clearly helped writing more portable, safer code. While i only have VC++ setup up to actually produce dll´s the others are used to compile a test-program that incorporates all code. I also played with the Intel C++ and that one looks very good also, i think i will buy it. On Windows thats the free Borland C++ Compiler, Cygwin Gcc and VC++, on Linux its (currently only)Gcc. Every night i compile everything i have with multiple compilers on multiple platforms. I came up with the MCMP rule ( Multiple Compilers – Multiple Platforms ). I even reduced Api calls to the bare minimum so that my code compiles quite clean. Fortunately i don´t have to use MFC, since all stuff i do is backend stuff. You could pay $100.00 for a library that is being phased out (MFC) or else you can use your brain and develop Standard C++ applications on Linux for free using open source boundary classes like Gtkmm.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |